Date Published:
Jun 01, 1991
Focus Area(s):
Author(s):
Code:
WP 1991-13

The center of the county’s agrarian question is rooted in the skewed land distribution pattern. In addition, this particular agrarian structure is a legacy of our colonial experience and a product of the accumulated adverse effects of the palliative land reform measures implemented by the past governments. These are the arguments central to this paper that aims to present an analysis of the past and present agrarian reform programs. Is land reform a viable development policy? What conditions will ensure a feasible implementation of land reform? These are the questions this study attempts to shed light on.

Citations

This publication has been cited 19 times

In other Publications
  1. Adamopoulos, Tasso. 2010. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. 2010 Meeting Papers 1145. Society for Economic Dynamics.
  2. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. American Economic Review, 104, no. 6, 1667-1697. American Economic Association.
  3. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Working Papers tecipa-509. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  4. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2019. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Working Papers tecipa-637. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  5. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2014. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Working Papers tecipa-525. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  6. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2019. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Working Papers 25780. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.
  7. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2015. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Working Papers tecipa-540. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  8. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2012. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. Meeting Papers 1083. Society for Economic Dynamics.
  9. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2020. Land reform and productivity: A quantitative analysis with micro data. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 12, no. 3, 1-39. American Economic Association.
  10. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2013. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. Working Papers tecipa-480. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  11. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2011. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. Working Papers tecipa-441. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  12. Adamopoulos, Tasso and Diego Restuccia. 2013. The size distribution of farms and international productivity differences. Working Papers tecipa-494. University of Toronto, Department of Economics.
  13. Ballesteros, Marife and Alma dela Cruz. 2006. Land reform and changes in land ownership concentration: Evidence from rice-growing villages in the Philippines. Development Economics Working Papers 22613. East Asian Bureau of Economic Research.
  14. Dela Cruz, Alma M. and Marife M. Ballesteros. 2006. Land reform and changes in land ownership concentration: Evidence from rice-growing villages in the Philippines. Discussion Papers DP 2006-21. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  15. Llanto, Gilberto M. and Marife M. Ballesteros. 2003. Land issues in poverty reduction strategies and the development agenda: Philippines. Discussion Papers DP 2003-03. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  16. Otsuka, Keijiro. 2021. Changing relationship between farm size and productivity and its implications for Philippine agriculture. Discussion Papers 2102. Graduate School of Economics, Kobe University.
  17. Plant R. 1993. Role of rural workers' organisations in economic and social development : a case study of the ILO's convention no. 141 in Mexico and the Philippines. ILO Working Papers 992974533402676. International Labour Organization.
  18. Reyes, Celia M. 2002. Impact of agrarian reform on poverty. Philippine Journal of Development PJD, 29 ,No. 2. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
  19. Reyes, Celia M. 2002. Impact of agrarian reform on poverty. Discussion Papers DP 2002-02. Philippine Institute for Development Studies.


Main Menu

Secondary Menu