Compared to the other six such as Singapore, Malaysia, Thailand, Vietnam, Myanmar, and Cambodia, the Philippines' telecommunication regulatory environment is significantly below international standards, indicated the recent findings of Philippine Institute for Development Studies (PIDS).
The low score of the Philippines can be attributed to a number of factors such as the lack of regulatory mandate over interconnection rates and universal access/service.
According to the study, the Philippines has an overall rating of 52.50, which is midway of the ideal level in the scoring system set by the International Telecommunications Union.
The seven countries were assessed in four clusters: regulatory authority, regulatory mandate, regulatory regime, and the competition framework.
Of the four clusters, the Philippines scored lowest in the regulatory regime with only 7 out of 30 points (23 percent). Regulatory regime reviews specific regulatory interventions and covers the kind of targeted regulation needed to promote a healthy competitive environment.
For one, the Philippines does not issue global/unified licenses, which is considered optimal and reflects increased market liberalization in the global market.
The PIDS study mentioned for instance the case of Myanmar, where the government does not compel operators to make publicly available information about
The absence of number portability, or the ability of mobile phone users to retain their mobile number when changing from one mobile network carrier to another, is also considered a weakness of Philippine telcos.
PIDS authors emphasized that policies that will reduce customer switching and search costs, as well as the promotion of the efficient use of facilities, embedding adequate monitoring and data reporting, and clearly specifying obligations or rules of conduct of various market players are seen as possible interventions to improve telcos in the country.
>Another flaw of Philippine telcos is on regulatory mandate, which evaluates the various regulatory functions of the regulator based on its thrusts.
In this cluster, the Philippines ranks second lowest with 10.5 next to Myanmar with 7.5 out of a possible 22 points.nbsp;
In the Philippines, acquiring the necessary authorization to provide telecommunications services is done in two levels. One is a license obtained from Congress and the other is a certificate from the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC).
PIDS also highlighted that while the NTC can revoke licenses and impose fines, still, it implements weak penalties.
According to the study, NTC's implementation of "unrealistically low fines" prescribed by old laws like the Public Services Act of 1936 (Commonwealth Act 146) that sets a fine of not more than P200 per day.
The low score of the Philippines can be attributed to a number of factors such as the lack of regulatory mandate over interconnection rates and universal access/service.
According to the study, the Philippines has an overall rating of 52.50, which is midway of the ideal level in the scoring system set by the International Telecommunications Union.
The seven countries were assessed in four clusters: regulatory authority, regulatory mandate, regulatory regime, and the competition framework.
Of the four clusters, the Philippines scored lowest in the regulatory regime with only 7 out of 30 points (23 percent). Regulatory regime reviews specific regulatory interventions and covers the kind of targeted regulation needed to promote a healthy competitive environment.
For one, the Philippines does not issue global/unified licenses, which is considered optimal and reflects increased market liberalization in the global market.
The PIDS study mentioned for instance the case of Myanmar, where the government does not compel operators to make publicly available information about
The absence of number portability, or the ability of mobile phone users to retain their mobile number when changing from one mobile network carrier to another, is also considered a weakness of Philippine telcos.
PIDS authors emphasized that policies that will reduce customer switching and search costs, as well as the promotion of the efficient use of facilities, embedding adequate monitoring and data reporting, and clearly specifying obligations or rules of conduct of various market players are seen as possible interventions to improve telcos in the country.
>Another flaw of Philippine telcos is on regulatory mandate, which evaluates the various regulatory functions of the regulator based on its thrusts.
In this cluster, the Philippines ranks second lowest with 10.5 next to Myanmar with 7.5 out of a possible 22 points.nbsp;
In the Philippines, acquiring the necessary authorization to provide telecommunications services is done in two levels. One is a license obtained from Congress and the other is a certificate from the National Telecommunications Commission (NTC).
PIDS also highlighted that while the NTC can revoke licenses and impose fines, still, it implements weak penalties.
According to the study, NTC's implementation of "unrealistically low fines" prescribed by old laws like the Public Services Act of 1936 (Commonwealth Act 146) that sets a fine of not more than P200 per day.
