The implementation of the roll-on/roll-off or Ro-Ro transport system raised household income in municipalities near ports, according to a study by Philippine Institute for Development Studies.
Former PIDS research analyst Kris Francisco, in her paper “The Impacts of Roll-On/Roll-Off Transport System in the Philippines,” found that the Ro-Ro program of the government had increased “household income by about 7 percent in municipalities near the Ro-Ro ports.”
Francisco said this was due to the “reduced cost of inter-island shipping and travel time” which stimulated both agriculture and non-agriculture-related activities.
Citing a previous study of the Asian Development Bank, she said the Ro-Ro policy was “able to cut the travel time between Mindanao and Luzon by 12 hours” and lowered the “cost of freight and passenger transport by about 30 percent and 40 percent, respectively.”
It also expanded the scope of regional markets by introducing new inter-island connections.
Aside from improving their income, the study also showed that the Ro-Ro policy “was able to generate a relatively long-term impact” as opportunities gained by households from the Ro-Ro port operation were extended to their children “in the form of human capital investment”.
Francisco said about 83,2017 males and 74,637 females were able to study because of the Ro-Ro port operations.
She said the increase in the financial capacity of households, especially those living near Ro-Ro ports, enabled them to send their children to school.
Implemented in 2003, Francisco said the Ro-Ro policy was able to integrate roads with water transportation by allowing vehicles to directly board the ship without unloading their cargoes and be easily transferred from one island to another, through the Ro-Ro ferry terminal system.
“The Ro-Ro policy was the government’s attempt to expand the country’s transport system with minimal investment. Instead of investing in new port infrastructure, [it] allowed the conversion of existing ports into Ro-Ro ports and encouraged private sector participation,” Francisco said.
Former PIDS research analyst Kris Francisco, in her paper “The Impacts of Roll-On/Roll-Off Transport System in the Philippines,” found that the Ro-Ro program of the government had increased “household income by about 7 percent in municipalities near the Ro-Ro ports.”
Francisco said this was due to the “reduced cost of inter-island shipping and travel time” which stimulated both agriculture and non-agriculture-related activities.
Citing a previous study of the Asian Development Bank, she said the Ro-Ro policy was “able to cut the travel time between Mindanao and Luzon by 12 hours” and lowered the “cost of freight and passenger transport by about 30 percent and 40 percent, respectively.”
It also expanded the scope of regional markets by introducing new inter-island connections.
Aside from improving their income, the study also showed that the Ro-Ro policy “was able to generate a relatively long-term impact” as opportunities gained by households from the Ro-Ro port operation were extended to their children “in the form of human capital investment”.
Francisco said about 83,2017 males and 74,637 females were able to study because of the Ro-Ro port operations.
She said the increase in the financial capacity of households, especially those living near Ro-Ro ports, enabled them to send their children to school.
Implemented in 2003, Francisco said the Ro-Ro policy was able to integrate roads with water transportation by allowing vehicles to directly board the ship without unloading their cargoes and be easily transferred from one island to another, through the Ro-Ro ferry terminal system.
“The Ro-Ro policy was the government’s attempt to expand the country’s transport system with minimal investment. Instead of investing in new port infrastructure, [it] allowed the conversion of existing ports into Ro-Ro ports and encouraged private sector participation,” Francisco said.
